<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pro Photography Roundtable Podcast #10 ~ Pet&#8217;s, Pew&#8217;s &amp; Nature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2008/10/15/pro-photography-roundtable-podcast-10-pets-pews-nature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2008/10/15/pro-photography-roundtable-podcast-10-pets-pews-nature/</link>
	<description>Photography Podcast. news, tips, inspiration, Photoshp, Lightroom, Worlflow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 05:27:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan Silva</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2008/10/15/pro-photography-roundtable-podcast-10-pets-pews-nature/comment-page-1/#comment-226995</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan Silva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/?p=608#comment-226995</guid>
		<description>Hey Gavin,

I agree with Scott, I listen both shows and both are different and great. You bring points and opinions that other shows do not. Keep it up that many people will appreciate that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Gavin,</p>
<p>I agree with Scott, I listen both shows and both are different and great. You bring points and opinions that other shows do not. Keep it up that many people will appreciate that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prophotoshow</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2008/10/15/pro-photography-roundtable-podcast-10-pets-pews-nature/comment-page-1/#comment-226608</link>
		<dc:creator>prophotoshow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/?p=608#comment-226608</guid>
		<description>Thanks Scott. Will do... Gav</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Scott. Will do&#8230; Gav</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Hayne</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2008/10/15/pro-photography-roundtable-podcast-10-pets-pews-nature/comment-page-1/#comment-226593</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Hayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/?p=608#comment-226593</guid>
		<description>Hey Gavin,
Thanks for having us on the show.  You really do a great job and we enjoy listening to you.  Keep it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Gavin,<br />
Thanks for having us on the show.  You really do a great job and we enjoy listening to you.  Keep it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prophotoshow</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2008/10/15/pro-photography-roundtable-podcast-10-pets-pews-nature/comment-page-1/#comment-226054</link>
		<dc:creator>prophotoshow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/?p=608#comment-226054</guid>
		<description>WOW what a masterful putdown of me and those of us who do PPS. Subtle, yet very cutting. I won&#039;t bother to debate it. Scott and Alex are great broadcasters who have more experience in broadcast media than myself.

As for my poll being bogus, you can believe that if it makes you comfortable. The results are not skewed. As to me thinking that LR is WAAAYY better than Aperture, I&#039;ve never said  that. I think the main thing Aperture lacks is &#039;true&quot; presets. For me that&#039;s like having a sports car without tires.

I am always open to allowing other opinions. In fact I ask for them. I appreciate that people like Aperture and have no problem with that. That does not mean however that I have to change my opinion.

Gav</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW what a masterful putdown of me and those of us who do PPS. Subtle, yet very cutting. I won&#8217;t bother to debate it. Scott and Alex are great broadcasters who have more experience in broadcast media than myself.</p>
<p>As for my poll being bogus, you can believe that if it makes you comfortable. The results are not skewed. As to me thinking that LR is WAAAYY better than Aperture, I&#8217;ve never said  that. I think the main thing Aperture lacks is &#8216;true&#8221; presets. For me that&#8217;s like having a sports car without tires.</p>
<p>I am always open to allowing other opinions. In fact I ask for them. I appreciate that people like Aperture and have no problem with that. That does not mean however that I have to change my opinion.</p>
<p>Gav</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2008/10/15/pro-photography-roundtable-podcast-10-pets-pews-nature/comment-page-1/#comment-226013</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/?p=608#comment-226013</guid>
		<description>Just to note, I didn&#039;t want to ever compare PPS to TWiP.  They are indeed two totally different shows.  TWiP&#039;s host&#039;s are very experienced in both audio and video production and photography and they put together a good show.  You put together a show that is completely different but its not bad to hear diversity and I enjoy the show equally as much.  As I said, I was commenting to try and understand why you thought there is such a huge difference between the two programs since most feel that the differences are minimal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to note, I didn&#8217;t want to ever compare PPS to TWiP.  They are indeed two totally different shows.  TWiP&#8217;s host&#8217;s are very experienced in both audio and video production and photography and they put together a good show.  You put together a show that is completely different but its not bad to hear diversity and I enjoy the show equally as much.  As I said, I was commenting to try and understand why you thought there is such a huge difference between the two programs since most feel that the differences are minimal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2008/10/15/pro-photography-roundtable-podcast-10-pets-pews-nature/comment-page-1/#comment-226000</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/?p=608#comment-226000</guid>
		<description>Gavin im not arguing about this anymore.  Put up a new poll if you want but its crazy to think that you have anymore professional listeners than TWiP does.  You have a great podcast and I wouldn&#039;t want to think about producing one of its caliber but it doesn&#039;t come close to TWiP in quality, number of listeners, professionalism or rank.  As a professional you should be able to agree that Aperture is just as good as Lightroom and admit that Lightroom works for you but your liking of it is strictly opinion.  The fact that they are equal in quality and features has been my main argument but you have yet to reply about this and thats all I wanted.  The reason I commented in the first place was because I was blown away by how weighted you made it sound on the show.  It sounded like LR was photoshop and Aperture was iPhoto and thats not true or even close to true.  TWiP express their opinion but says that its opinion.  Scott is a Aperture T3 certified instructor and Fred heads Lightrooms marketing and they both agreed on air that features are equal and it comes down to personal preference.  Thats a very fair statement.  Implying that the one you choose to use is superior to the other isn&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gavin im not arguing about this anymore.  Put up a new poll if you want but its crazy to think that you have anymore professional listeners than TWiP does.  You have a great podcast and I wouldn&#8217;t want to think about producing one of its caliber but it doesn&#8217;t come close to TWiP in quality, number of listeners, professionalism or rank.  As a professional you should be able to agree that Aperture is just as good as Lightroom and admit that Lightroom works for you but your liking of it is strictly opinion.  The fact that they are equal in quality and features has been my main argument but you have yet to reply about this and thats all I wanted.  The reason I commented in the first place was because I was blown away by how weighted you made it sound on the show.  It sounded like LR was photoshop and Aperture was iPhoto and thats not true or even close to true.  TWiP express their opinion but says that its opinion.  Scott is a Aperture T3 certified instructor and Fred heads Lightrooms marketing and they both agreed on air that features are equal and it comes down to personal preference.  Thats a very fair statement.  Implying that the one you choose to use is superior to the other isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
