<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: File Format Degradation! Saving &#038; Destructive Edits Compared</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2008/03/25/file-format-degradation-saving-destructive-edits-compared/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2008/03/25/file-format-degradation-saving-destructive-edits-compared/</link>
	<description>Photography Podcast. news, tips, inspiration, Photoshp, Lightroom, Worlflow</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg P</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2008/03/25/file-format-degradation-saving-destructive-edits-compared/#comment-81132</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2008/03/25/file-format-degradation-saving-destructive-edits-compared/#comment-81132</guid>
		<description>Thanks for testing this and sharing this.  I was most surprised by the resizing by 1 pixel image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for testing this and sharing this.  I was most surprised by the resizing by 1 pixel image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RAW vs JPEG Part 1,235 &#171; {Ideagirl Here}</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2008/03/25/file-format-degradation-saving-destructive-edits-compared/#comment-80268</link>
		<dc:creator>RAW vs JPEG Part 1,235 &#171; {Ideagirl Here}</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2008/03/25/file-format-degradation-saving-destructive-edits-compared/#comment-80268</guid>
		<description>[...] A great explanation with examples here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A great explanation with examples here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tore Tang</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2008/03/25/file-format-degradation-saving-destructive-edits-compared/#comment-80198</link>
		<dc:creator>Tore Tang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2008/03/25/file-format-degradation-saving-destructive-edits-compared/#comment-80198</guid>
		<description>It would also be interesting to see how the degradation evolved with the "save as..." and "resize" options. These were clearly the processes which generated the worst images, and if you had one picture which was "saved as" 10 times, one "saved as" 20 times, one "saved as" 30 times, etc. we could se if there was a critical point where an abrupt degradation ocurred or if the process degraded the picture linearly with only small changes from 10-fold to 10-fold "save as..." actions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would also be interesting to see how the degradation evolved with the &#8220;save as&#8230;&#8221; and &#8220;resize&#8221; options. These were clearly the processes which generated the worst images, and if you had one picture which was &#8220;saved as&#8221; 10 times, one &#8220;saved as&#8221; 20 times, one &#8220;saved as&#8221; 30 times, etc. we could se if there was a critical point where an abrupt degradation ocurred or if the process degraded the picture linearly with only small changes from 10-fold to 10-fold &#8220;save as&#8230;&#8221; actions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2008/03/25/file-format-degradation-saving-destructive-edits-compared/#comment-80183</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 08:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2008/03/25/file-format-degradation-saving-destructive-edits-compared/#comment-80183</guid>
		<description>Wow - those are some scary results! I'm glad I shoot in RAW and use LR and PS to avoid this kind of thing. Having said that would I really open and save a jpeg 100 times?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow - those are some scary results! I&#8217;m glad I shoot in RAW and use LR and PS to avoid this kind of thing. Having said that would I really open and save a jpeg 100 times?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
