<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Canon SLR lenses in the works</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2007/10/17/more-canon-slr-lenses-in-the-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2007/10/17/more-canon-slr-lenses-in-the-works/</link>
	<description>Photography Podcast. news, tips, inspiration, Photoshp, Lightroom, Worlflow</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 08:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2007/10/17/more-canon-slr-lenses-in-the-works/#comment-30196</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 23:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2007/10/17/more-canon-slr-lenses-in-the-works/#comment-30196</guid>
		<description>I would love to get my hands on the 200 f2, altho even with the 135 f2, unless your subject is kinda far away, the focus sometimes has trouble, with such an ultra thing dof.

i've used it A LOT with my canon 40d, and two 1d mark II cameras.

I'm hoping that the 135L just doesn't focus that quick, cause my 200 f2.8 is VERRRRY fast and accurate to focus, as well as my 300 f2.8 which gets even less in focus, but always very sharp.  But again those are f2.8 lenses.  I hope F2.0 apertures don't tend to be hard to get into focus (up close, again my 135L is great for a head-to-toe shot in NCAA football on my 40d).

besides NCAA shooting, i do a lot of HS shootings as well.  i may sell my 300 f2.8 for the 200 f2 after a lot of reviews are out.

dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to get my hands on the 200 f2, altho even with the 135 f2, unless your subject is kinda far away, the focus sometimes has trouble, with such an ultra thing dof.</p>
<p>i&#8217;ve used it A LOT with my canon 40d, and two 1d mark II cameras.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping that the 135L just doesn&#8217;t focus that quick, cause my 200 f2.8 is VERRRRY fast and accurate to focus, as well as my 300 f2.8 which gets even less in focus, but always very sharp.  But again those are f2.8 lenses.  I hope F2.0 apertures don&#8217;t tend to be hard to get into focus (up close, again my 135L is great for a head-to-toe shot in NCAA football on my 40d).</p>
<p>besides NCAA shooting, i do a lot of HS shootings as well.  i may sell my 300 f2.8 for the 200 f2 after a lot of reviews are out.</p>
<p>dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
