<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PPS #38 Image Enhancement Software &amp; Noise Reduction Reviewed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2007/10/07/pps-38-image-enhancement-software-noise-reduction-reviewed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2007/10/07/pps-38-image-enhancement-software-noise-reduction-reviewed/</link>
	<description>Photography Podcast. news, tips, inspiration, Photoshp, Lightroom, Worlflow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:27:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Annicedda</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2007/10/07/pps-38-image-enhancement-software-noise-reduction-reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-123618</link>
		<dc:creator>Annicedda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 16:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2007/10/07/pps-38-image-enhancement-software-noise-reduction-reviewed/#comment-123618</guid>
		<description>A free tool I really like for photo editing is Snapfish. I recommend checking it out. They have tools for auto image enhancement, auto cropping, auto horizon alignment and more. Here is where I found the info: http://www.hp.com/idealab/us/en/snapfish.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A free tool I really like for photo editing is Snapfish. I recommend checking it out. They have tools for auto image enhancement, auto cropping, auto horizon alignment and more. Here is where I found the info: <a href="http://www.hp.com/idealab/us/en/snapfish.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.hp.com/idealab/us/en/snapfish.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Drufke</title>
		<link>http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2007/10/07/pps-38-image-enhancement-software-noise-reduction-reviewed/comment-page-1/#comment-14905</link>
		<dc:creator>David Drufke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 02:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prophotoshow.net/blog/2007/10/07/pps-38-image-enhancement-software-noise-reduction-reviewed/#comment-14905</guid>
		<description>I have all three noise reduction tools.  Dfine 2.0 is my favorite.  It automatically creates the noise reduction in a new layer, so if it strips out too much detail, I reduce the opacity of the layer, usually to around 60-70%.  I find this brings a more natural look to the images if Dfine overdoes it.  Neat Images works good too, but it&#039;s auto profiler often can&#039;t find an area to sample, and it doesn&#039;t remove noise from green areas (maybe to protect grass?).  The green issue alone is enough for me to use Dfine.  Noise Ninja isn&#039;t as good, but is way better than non-dedicated tools.

Oh, and with both Dfine and Neat Image, if it samples a white area only, select a new sample area as there is almost never noise in white.  Thanks Gavin.  I signed up for the link exchange a while ago and haven&#039;t heard anything.  Is it still around?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have all three noise reduction tools.  Dfine 2.0 is my favorite.  It automatically creates the noise reduction in a new layer, so if it strips out too much detail, I reduce the opacity of the layer, usually to around 60-70%.  I find this brings a more natural look to the images if Dfine overdoes it.  Neat Images works good too, but it&#8217;s auto profiler often can&#8217;t find an area to sample, and it doesn&#8217;t remove noise from green areas (maybe to protect grass?).  The green issue alone is enough for me to use Dfine.  Noise Ninja isn&#8217;t as good, but is way better than non-dedicated tools.</p>
<p>Oh, and with both Dfine and Neat Image, if it samples a white area only, select a new sample area as there is almost never noise in white.  Thanks Gavin.  I signed up for the link exchange a while ago and haven&#8217;t heard anything.  Is it still around?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
