The Straight Dope on Digital Resolution and Printable Size.

by Gavin Seim: Updated 11/22/12. There’s a lot of confusion out there about resolution as it relates to making prints, so I want to help clear it up. I make mostly large prints and spend quite a bit of time studying factors that effect my image quality. Often I use a 5D MK II, which is 21MP. I also use 4×5 film because of it’;s vastly higher resolution. It scans in at closer to 200MP. But to start with lets use an average 18MP file as our example.

First let me say that digital has a long way to go in terms of resolution. Today’s camera’s are amazing, but lets get a perspective. Ansel Adams did much of his work on 8×10 sheet film. It’s hard to compare film to digital exactly, but using a good film he probably would have had a rough equivalent of around 400 million (mega) pixels. This makes our digital cameras look pretty paltry at times and it’s one of the reasons I’ve started working with 4×5 film for some of my projects, as it can give me  200+ effective megapixels when scanned (more of that on my pictorials website).

Say we have a full size file from a Canon 7D. The resolution of that file would be 5184×3456 pixels. About 18 mega pixels (roughly 22x less than that 8×10 film). Our file comes in at just over 11 x 17 at 300 PPI. Note that PPI and DPI refers to Pixels Per Inch or Dots Per Inch (a printing term). For today’s purpose I’ll refer to it as PPI as it’s becoming the more common term.

First and foremost, PPI and actual file resolution (or pixels) are not always the same. For example I could take our file in Photoshop and set the size to 30×20. Unless I told PS to Resample (or increase the resolution) of the file, the computer would now see this file as a 20×30. Only now it would show as being just over 172 PPI instead of 300 because the pixels have not changed or increased, which means there must be less pixel per inch when printed at that size – It’s still an 18MP file. I’ve just told the computer it’s larger in physical print size. What really matter however is if you have enough overall resolution. Here a screen capture to show how I was changing PPI. The PPI on each is different, but the pixel quantity is the same.

So what if I printed this file as a 4×6. I’m not sure why I would want a print that small (see the wall portrait article), but bear with me. At 4×6 our 18MP file would print out at just over 860PPI if we left it at full resolution. That’s a lot since most human eyes can’t see any difference above 300PPI. Bottom line, my file has more than enough pixels. Printing with that extra PPI won’t hurt anything. Though depending on the printer, all that information may not be used.

Why does all this matter. Well mainly so you don’t get confused. PPI has relevance in sizing and printing because it can quickly tell us something about how good our print will be. That brings us to larger prints and how this all relates.

Click for larger view – Gavin’s 30 inch canvas, Bull of the Mist. This a medium sized print. Taken in early morning at ISO 3200 made the detail on this slightly less, but it was needed for shutter speed. As you can see, the detail is good, but not flawless. The canvas helps give it an organic art feel. This was made from a file that was 5464 x 2732 pixels. It was up converted to 9000px wide before print. More about this image here.

Resolution VS Large prints.
This is where things get subjective. I’ll speak from my own experience as I regularly produce prints 40 inches and beyond. With our 18MP file we know we have plenty of information for a baby print. What about a serious print meant for the wall. Lets look at that 20×30 again. Lets go into the “Image Size” box of Photoshop and changing the file dimensions to 20×30, without altering the resolution as I did above. I left Resample un-checked which means I changed the print size but not the amount of pixels in the file. We’ll now have 172PPI at a print size of 30×20. Are you getting it? This is telling us how much information we have to lay on paper in terms of real life printed pixels – 172PPI is not bad. Most peoples eyes can probably see a bit more detail than that, but the print should still be good.

Click for larger view – Crags of Yellowstone Falls first edition. Made from a 5D MK2 file 3744 x 5616 and up-converted to 300 ppi before printing. At 30in detail is great. It’s actually better than it seems, as this is a snapshot of the actual mounted silver print. This could easily be made as a 50 inch or beyond. More info on this image here.

OK. How Large Can We Go?
If you make small prints, say under 24 inches. Resolution should not be much issue. But lets say we want a 50 inch print. Going into “Image Size” I’ll set it to 50 inches wide without increasing the resolution. The result is that the file is now only 103 PPI. Not too great. We could print like this, but we’re probably going to see some pixels. To get a rough idea how it will look in print, I’ll turn on the rulers in PS (View/Rulers) then zoom up till an inch shows as a real world inch (I check it with an actual ruler if in doubt). That’s not a perfect representation, as print and screen are different mediums, but it will give us a decent idea of how pixelated it will look – In practice I’ve found that I really start to see pixels as soon as I hit 36 inches or above. That’s not to say I won’t print that large. But I do start to see loss of detail and the bigger I go, the more it can fall apart.

How Low is Too Low?
How many PPI do we really need. Again this is subjective. It depends on what you like, how close it will be viewed etc.  That said, personally I want great detail in my prints. Even close up. I’ve experimented with it and asked labs about it. In general I’ve determined that if an image falls below 120PPI, I had better do something about it. Personally I usually do something about it if it’s anywhere under 200PPI, because I want quality as high as possible.

What Do We Do About It?
So the native max resolution of our camera is 5124×3456. We can’t change that. What we can do as interpolate or “Resample”. Essentially this means that rather than simply printing with too little resolution, we tell the computer what resolution we want the file to be and the software does it’s best to fill in the gaps. Let me be clear. This is NOT  as good as having native resolution. The computer is trying to add pixels that were not captured by the camera. It can do a fair job, but you always want to have the max native resolution possible when making a large print. That’s why O love printing from scanned 4×5 film. I can get a native 300DPI even at 50 inches because my scans are 15,000 pixels wide.

The Resample option inside the “Image Size” window of CS5 forward is good. Older versions of PS will do it also. I generally take it a step further however and use the Perfect Resize plugin from OnOne software (there’s a discount from them on our deals page). In my tests Perfect Resize seems slightly better than what’s built into Photoshop. There’s also other tools for increasing resolution such as Blow Up from Alien Skin.

Generally I do all my edits first, keeping my original file at native resolution. I Resample last, just before sending to the printer or lab. I generally Resample up to 300 PPI at whatever physical size I plan to print at. In the case of our 50 inch print, that means I want a file that’s 15,000 pixels wide. Almost triple what we started with. Like I said, this is not as good as if we truly had 15k pixels from the camera. Not by a mile. When looked at very close, a large up converted image can look a bit painterly and it gets more pixelated the more you push it. But re-sampling is still a valid tool for increasing print size.

But Really. How Large Can We Print?
This is what you really want to know. Fine, but there are variables. Like how far it will be viewed from (a billboard is a huge print, but seen from much further away than a bathroom wall). What is the medium (a glossy print shows more pixel blemishes than the texture of a canvas print). And of course, what are your quality standard.

On a practical level I would be willing to print this file at 60 and maybe 70 inches on canvas. But to do that I would spend a good bit of time refining the file, healing away artifacts, getting a good grain structure, etc. If I made a 70 inch print from this file I might spend a good 2-4 hours working the file before I even Resampled it. On prints over 50 inches I might also favor a textured surface like canvas (which is a favorite of mine anyways) as the texture helps hide a slight lack of detail.

Thirty six inches or less is generally no problem if you have a file with good details (see the Six Keys). But without the texture of something like canvas to hide pixels, I could still see the digital structure starting at about thirty to thirty-six inches. I would Resample and take steps in editing to keep the file quality high (ie, working in 16bit mode, avoiding needless file copies, etc).

In the end we can only work with what we have. Cameras are getting better and they do amazing things. But as high as resolution has gotten, we still need more. If you printed a 60 inch from this file and then set it side by side with a print made from large format film, it would make your digital feel like a row boat going up against a battleship. I’ve been there (with my camera, not the row boat). Seeing what film can still do makes you think and it made me start using film for some of work. You need to go to a gallery of a photographer that still uses large format film so see what I mean.

Bear in mind that image quality is also important. We’ve talked about resolution today, but no matter what your resolution you won’t get a good print from a bad image. Making really amazing large prints demands that every step of your process be top notch. For more on that read Six Keys to Getting Great Image Quality in your Photos. Also give a listen to PPS podcast #74 – Crazy Awesome Image Quality as I go more in depth on quality concepts in that recording.

Good luck… Gav

Click for larger view – My print of Stars of Coldest night. 30×65 canvas, first run. This was made from a MK2 file that was cropped to 5020 x 2015. It was Resampled to 200 ppi before printing at 65 inches. If you looks at the detail it looks good, but there is a bit of painterly effect that comes from up-converting the pixels so much. It looks great on the wall, though a large format film would have given a different detail than we see here. More on this image here… http://bit.ly/ee5tyQ