How often do you go into a gallery and see a masterpiece that’s not signed?
by Gavin Seim Updated 10/11: If your name is not on your work, you’re missing out. The reality is that selling photos is not about just having a passion, it’s about business. Is your work just piece of paper, or is it a piece if art? Often people who don’t brand their images do so under the guise of giving a higher level of quality. In reality it’s often because they’re inexperienced, lack confidence and don’t consider their images of high enough value to hang equally next to other art.
It’s no insult to have classy branding on an image. In fact it generally adds value. How often do you buy a book without the authors name on the front? Even the cars we buy have logos on them. If you bought a Ferrari would you want it without the emblem? I think not. Why then should the art we make be unmarked! Are there exceptions? Sure, but not many. For example a commercial client may require unbranded images, but they should also expect to pay a premium for that privilege. Artists have been branding their work for centuries and so should you.

This night HDR of the Seattle skyline shows an example of how I mark images for gallery and print exhibitions while keeping them classy. I hand sign my best pieces, as we'll talk about below. Take the time to work on a good signature. While this is very subdued, people do look at signatures and names. It keeps it classy yet keeps the brand strong.
What To Do?
This whole topic is fraught with debate and uncertainty, especially among photographers. No doubt some people will disagree with me. That’s OK. But I probably have slaved more than most on this and I’ve come to a place where I have some understanding of my brand. This is not just my random inexperienced opinion. I sell all my portraits and my fine art using the approaches I’m about to discuss. I’m always refining ideas however and will update this post accordingly in the future. OK Lets look at some options.
Blogs, Facebook, Flickr etc:
My preference is always to have people in my studio gallery, viewing my large format hand signed wall portraits. But I can’t always have that. For web I generally post images around 700 880px wide. I don’t want huge files, but this is not 1995 and I want images large enough to be seen and look amazing on a screen. If you want to see this in practice, you can see all my sites via my homepage.
My web images are sometimes more heavily branded than my prints, but I keep making them cleaner. I used to place an overlay bar on the bottom with my name. It’s clear and bold, but some think it’s too much (including me now) and that’s OK because there are alternatives. Just remember we’re in a business to sell. We want people to know who took the photo so they’ll find us themselves. Often times I simply add my signature for web images. It’s not as bold as the bar style, but it shows my name and looks clean. It’s not about how big your name is. It’s about presenting it well.
Infringement Concerns: Some photographers want to eliminate the possibility of someone cropping their name off of their image and it being passed around with no branding. To combat this they sometimes plaster their name right across the middle of the image. While this makes it hard (but not impossible) to remove their name, it also looks stupid, particularly if it’s on your primary portfolio.
Again, this is not 1995. When you add a logo or watermark to the middle of your presentation it distracts from your work. Paranoia of infringement can be taken so far as to do more harm than good. Remember these are low res files and there’s only so much someone could do with them.
I found a happy medium to be the best approach. I sometimes use this double corner branding (shown below). There’s various ways it could be applied, but the idea is to get your brand in two opposite corners, without it being overbearing. It helps keep your brand clearly in view without totally distracting us from the image. I’ll also use this method on FB images sometimes. Signature in the corner, FB URL top left. Generally in a soft grey tone to reduce distraction.

Double Corner Branding - A more subdued method than the overlay bar that helps prevent you name being cropped out. In the bottom right I've placed my signature, and in the upper left my name, FB page etc. While it's still possible to crop this, much of the image would have to be removed. Overlays of this nature keep your brand strong, but can stay subtle and keep the focus on your image.

Bar Branding - A method I used to use for web images and blog posts. It's bold, but even if this gets re-posted somewhere as a low quality web image, people will still be able to see who made it at a glance. Lately I've favored a cleaner presentation however. It's not terrible, but it does distract, so I don't use it any more. Just weight the costs.
Portfolio Galleries:
I want the portfolio galleries on my site to be clean and classy, like an art gallery. I want branding of some kind because building my brand is valuable, but instead of placing a big logo, these images have my signature small in the corner (as below). This keeps it subtle without ignoring my brand.

Signature Branding - My digital signature method used on my pictorial work on f164.com. Yes, it could be removed but it's a small file and having it look classy trumps paranoia. Remember, if someone really wants to remove your name, they can usually do it no matter how annoying you make it. Since most people don't want to, I keep it classy.

Signature Branding - Another example from a gallery on Seim Weddings. On portfolios I want branding, but not distractions. I want the images to be the total focus here, but a classy brand to also have a subconscious place in the viewers mind. This is the look I use on most web presentations these days. Clean, simple, memorable.
High Resolution Files & Disks:
My wedding and portrait clients can get a disk at certain package levels (usually after an album or wall portrait). It’s meant for them to make their own prints up to 8×12 , not just given away as the main product. It’s an expensive add on ($600-1000). Or more often, a perk I use to get client to purchase my large packages that already include wall portraits or albums.
The files are 2000px wide and yes I absolutely brand these. I have seen large groups of them appear on FB and clients may print and send them to friends. I’m not ashamed of my work and people should know who made it. How do I keep it classy? There’s no rule here, but lately I’ve been overlaying my signature in the corner rather than placing a logo. I feel a signature is more timeless than a logo. It’s subtle and gives the image class while still letting people know who made it. I’ve never had a complaint about it… Ever.

Signature Branding - An image with a signature corner like a client might receive if they get a disk. My signature is not my logo, but it's is more timeless and makes sense on for print images. This could be done various ways depending on your look. Just keep it classy and keep it branded.
Small Gift Prints up to 16×20.
These are made similar to the way I do high res files. Hand signing is reserved for my large signature wall prints. On gift prints my signature is overlaid in the corner as I export from LR to print or send to the lab. Not too big, but easily readable and still clean. As long as you don’t overdo it, a client is not going to complain about your name on the corner of your images. In fact in my experience clients usually expect and even appreciate some identification. It’s basic professionalism for an artist to sign their work in some way.
Signature Wall Portraits:
These are what I focus on with nearly every project. These pieces (usually canvas or metal) start at 24 inches wide, are extremely high quality and are priced from about $600. I look to place at least a 24″ wall print for every client (and I usually do). I’m fine with them buying the disk and making their own 5×7′s as long as the real art is prepared to perfection by me and hanging on their wall with my signature on it. Yes clients do buy these. They love them. For more on selling wall portraits see this article.
I treat signature series images much like a painter would treat an original piece. Their my best, they go out the door hand signed, with a certificate of authenticity (I bought a template here). They have a official title and come with a lifetime guarantee. Not placing my signature on these would be to devalue them. It would be like an original painting that had no artist signature. Not a chance.

Hand Signature - It's a little intimidating taking a pen to a 50" canvas but you'll get used to it. Practice on a piece of paper first and remember that a signature does not have to be perfect. I'll talk about pens further down.

An example of the certificate of authenticity that comes with my Heirloom Wall Portraits. It's not essential, merely another way to add a touch of class and value. It's a bit of extra work, but I title every signature wall print and give it a certificate.
Size & position:
Size matters. You want your name seen, yet you don’t want to look like a narcissistic jerk and you don’t want the the mark too distracting. As you can see I generally place markings in a corner. Just use common sense when it comes to size. Experiment and see how things look in print and on screen. As I said above, I’m don’t like the large mark or name across the whole image. While it may work to protect images, it does not make your brand look classy. You’ll never see it in my portfolio, though “sometimes” in my online proof galleries where an entire image collection is posted I do use it. Just be careful.
I experiment with size and space around edges untill it feels right. Also for disks from which prints will be made, leave a bit extra as printers may trim and frames will take up a bit of edge. It’s tacky to have a signature partly cut off.
Not Branding at all:
You’re kidding right? After all this. Whether images are on your blog or prints on clients wall. Not branding is like giving up free advertising so you can pay for less effective advertising elsewhere.
As I’ve said, there are exceptions. I’m speaking mainly of portraiture and fine art here. If you’re shooting commercial work the client will often require unmarked images. That’s OK, but they should be paying accordingly. That means a lot more, and those images should still be branded when in your portfolio.
Marking and signature tools:
Batch Marking: Nearly all my digital logos and branding are batch applied from Lightroom using Mogrify, a LR export plugin. It’s fast, flexible and effective, allowing me place overlays on any file as I export, while giving me total control over size and position. I can mark hundreds of images without so much as a sore index finger.
It’s also possible to use the “Place” command and make Photoshop actions that will overlay image, but that’s the old way and it’s not nearly as easy as with LR and Mogrify however. Lr3 also has built in watermark tools that will overlay a signature nicely, but Mogrify does more, allowing multiple overlays, borders on image etc.
Also, I got my signature to digital using Adobe Illustrator. It smooths out the jaggy lines we often get when drawing on a computer, making them feel natural. Between that and a tablet I was able to get my perfect signature. My real signature is not this flawless, but this one is great for online images and more because it’s clean, fairly readable and versatile. You could get a great version of your signature on paper and scan it.

Digital Signature - A bit more perfect, but very close to my actual signature. I overlay this on nearly all web images and small prints. I use a metallic or middle gray tone and it works on nearly all image tones.
Hand Signatures: Everyone should have a good signature for their art. If you are not happy with yours, fix it.
I’ve tried plenty of pens. In the end I usually stick with silver or gold metallic paint pens because they overlay a heavy opaque stroke and the metallic stands out, while still looking professional. Gel and ballpoint ink pens can work, but often are too thin to see clearly. They also don’t well work on all paper surfaces and sometimes fizzle out in the middle of a signing (not good).
Currently my favorite for signing photos is the Sakura Pen Touch .7mm extra fine point paint pens. You can find them on Amazon or from Blick Art Supply. They work on raw paper, canvas and metal prints alike and seem to maintain a smooth but bold line on all. Alternately I like the Y&C (Yasumoto) Extra Fine Metallic Marker. While I generally use the Sakura, the Y&C is a close second. I find the Y&C lays on a bit more ink, which can be good on some surfaces (such as un-coated luster paper) or for people who want a bit bolder signature. Their a bit harder to find, but I found them on the company’s website. There’s also the Pilot Silver Marker Extra Fine Point that works pretty well.
Watch for spatters with paint pens. I have yet to find one that is completely free from them. Before you sign shake it up and get it flowing. If it seems drippy dab the tip gently with a paper towel. Run a few practice signatures to warm up your pen and your hand before signing the corner of a valuable print.
Don’t over stress when signing. Practice so you can consistently make a good signature, but remember it’s a real signature and does not have to be perfect. When ready, place your image on a solid surface where you can get a comfortable hand position. If you mess it up a little, it’s usually better to leave it unique, then try to remove or add to it. This usually leads to a big mess that might end up with you buying a new print.
Other things I’ve tried:
I’m not kidding when I say I’ve slaved over this topic. I’ve tried so many things. Some were awful, some just didn’t suit me. Here’s a few of the things I tried and then retired. Maybe you can avoid the same mistakes.

Oh ya! I printed a large canvas order this way for a client. Ouch! OK for web images perhaps (though still distracting) but way too much for a wall print. I re-made the whole order and stopped doing all prints this way. A signature is far more classy.

After the above I used this more subtle watermark on prints before going the signature route. It's not terrible, but whether digitally overlaid or hand signed, I prefer the high quality feel of my signature. A good signature is timeless. Even if you change it in the future it will retain it's class.

This was something I tried for web images as well. Thing is it's distracting and it still does not tell someone who stumbles across an image on the web how to find me. I want people to be able to identify me and find more of my work easily. Just an S is not good enough and certainly now a bright green one.
Closing thoughts for good branding:
- You CAN overdo it. Stay balanced.
- Not knowing what to do is no excuse. Work it out.
- Keep is classy (simple is always a good place to start).
- Think like a client buying art (what do they see?).
I’m not the final word on this, but my experiences have taught me a lot. My ideas may change in the future as I’m always analyzing, listening and trying things. What does not change however is that branding and name recognition is important. If you ignore it, you’re just wasting precious time because you’ll have to work it out sooner or later in this saturated market. Finding your brand takes time however, so don’t panic. Just start thinking it thru and find a way that works for you.
Finally. I sell all my work as art. An 8×10 does not compete with a beautiful painting. But master that amazing image on a 30×40 canvas and the whole game changes. A great wall print is in a whole other league and yes, clients will buy them. You can learn more about wall portrait selling and concepts in this article.
A Final Recap…
- So as a rule do not put a bold logo on prints. These change over time and can be a large distraction, depending on your logo. If you use a logo on a quality print. You’ll probably regret it later.
- Logo’s can be OK for web images, but try not to make it to distracting. Still, you can always change it later if you like. That said, I generally use my digital signature these days. Not my logo.
- For prints I always use my signature, either digitally or by hand. A signature is not a logo. It’s my written name. I keep it in the corner with a bit of space. Viewers can easily find who made the print and it has a art quality to it.
- Remember to see thru photographer and client eyes. Can you find who made the art? Does it feel classy? Is it timeless? Does the mark distract from the art? Keep asking yourself questions and you’ll get it.
That’s all for today. Good luck… Gavin
































Great tips and ideas! Thanks for the wonderful insight!
Thank you Gavin for great tips! I was just looking for tips for pens to sign canvas-prints. If you have any tips which pens also to avoid for canvas signing, it would be much appreciated!
Thanks Niko. I did add a bit more to the pens paragraph, giving a few more details on the why and how.
Great info! I have had some issues with the spattering with some of the metallic pens, so thank you for this great advice! Gotta try the pens you are using…. :)) Thanks again!!
Hi Gavin,
I really enjoyed the article! I, like most photographers, always brand my electronic images on the web, but in the past have been resistant to branding client prints. Do you ever run into resistance from wedding or portrait clients with respect to your branding? I’d be interested to hear how you approach or prevent this if you do. Thanks a lot. I really appreciate the site.
Charlie
I have no trouble with it. As mentioned in the article, the only time it was an issue is when I overdid those client prints with that green logo (see example). As long as you keep it classy there should be no problem. Espexialy if you use real signatures on your better prints. That actually adds more value to most clients.
I have only glanced over this so far and the comments are positive. I have a view on this subject and I go back and forth – probably like you do.
Very interesting blog post. Very useful! Thank you for sharing!
Thanks for these tips. It really gives me something to think about as i plug along and try to learn all I can. I very much appreciate your experience here.
Best,
Laurie Hemmer
Hello Gavin,
I would like to know where you get your “certificate of authenticity”?
Thank you,
Patricia
Let the debate commence!
Glad you posted this I am working on ideas for this next week. Thanks…. Great insights.
WOW!! LOVE THE INFO!! THANKS SO MUCH!! I HAVE A QUESTION……… I FEEL REALLY SILLY THAT I HAVEN’T FIGURED THIS OUT, BUT HAVE EVEN EMAILED PAST INSTRUCTOR’S AND STILL HAVE NO FIRM ANSWER… WHEN MAKING MY LOGO IN PHOTOSHOP, HOW CAN I SAVE IT IN A MANNER THAT WILL ALLOW ME TO JUST OPEN THE FILE AND ADD IT TO AN IMAGE WITHOUT THE ACTUAL “WHITE BACKGROUND” COMING WITH IT! I HAVE TRIED SAVING AS A TRANSPARENT, AND EVEN MAKING THE ORIGINAL PHOTOSHOP DOCUMENT AS A TRANSPARENCY IN THE BEGINNING, BUT WHEN OPENED BACK UP, DRAGGED TO ANOTHER IMAGE OR DOCUMENT, THE WHOLE THING COMES ALONG, NOT JUST MY LOGO.. ANY THOUGHTS?? THANKS SO MUCH!
I came across your page just looking for the right kind of pen to sign photo’s on canvas but you have so much more info that is really helpful. Thank you for having it out there!!!!! I have a question about who should sign an image. I am thinking about selling photos on canvas (as artwork) that my dad took in the 60′s. He is still alive but has alzheimers and a shaky hand – should I try and have him sign the pictures or should I somehow sign for him, maybe using my name, I’m just not sure and this is all very new to me. Thanks for any advise you may have!!!!!
Hey Temira thanks. Glad you got something from it. As to your dads prints. Unless he can sign it I’d say no signature. In my mind a signature is not suitable unless it’s the real deal. You could also make digital signature from a previous document (not sold as a real signature of course). Or just use a printed name.
Excellent presentation, Gavin–thanks for sharing your thoughts, experience, and evolution. Only one question comes up for me that wasn’t really addressed, and I’m curious as to your thoughts on this…
What if the signature cannot be fully deciphered, and the name is uncommon (like mine)? I agree that a beautiful signature is the best overall solution, but in practice it’s not very useful if the name cannot be read, no?
Good point Adriel. That can be a problem. I would submit that people think about the design of their signature carefully. I like mine to look good, but I also consider readability valid because unless you’re very well known people will not know what it means. For those with less than readable signature I would suggest a refinement of how they sign their name.
G